BREAKING: Trudeau's censorship czar walks back comments about social media users being subject to regulation

Steven Guilbeault, Trudeau's heritage minister, now says that he used "unclear language" when he suggested that social media users with large followings will be subject to regulation under Bill-C-10, the widely-panned internet censorship bill.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Steven Guilbeault, Trudeau's heritage minister, now says that he used "unclear language" when he suggested that social media users with large followings will be subject to regulation under Bill-C-10, the widely-panned internet censorship bill.

The attempted clarification comes after yet another disastrous interview with CTV's Evan Solomon during which he suggested social media users with "millions of viewers" who are "generating a lot of money on social media" would be counted as broadcasters.

The new statement says Guilbeault "should have been more precise" with his words: “An individual - a person - who uses social media will never be considered as broadcasters and will not be subject to the obligations or regulations within the Broadcasting Act. ... When social media platforms produce content for Canadians to watch or listen to -- for broadcast-- the platforms will be regulated... If a social media platform contracts an individual to produce content for broadcast, it will still be the social media platform that faces regulation."

During the interview with Solomon, Guilbeault sparked outrage by saying:

"What we want to do, this law should apply to people who are broadcasters, or act like broadcasters. So if you have a YouTube channel with millions of viewers, and you're deriving revenues from that, then at some point the CRTC will be asked to put a threshold. But we're talking about broadcasters here, we're not talking about everyday citizens posting stuff on their YouTube channel,” said Guilbeault.

Solomon slammed Guilbeault for loose language behind the bill, and said that despite the bill's writing that excludes individuals, it could still open the window to regulating user-generated content and overregulation.

"I've read that section, that excludes individuals, but it specifically does not exclude content and so it still leaves the door open. There was another exemption in there, 4.2, that seemed to satisfy everyone. Your government took it out. This is a hugely contentious issue," said Solomon.

"When you and I go on YouTube, we can decide to watch whatever we want, and YouTube makes a lot of suggestions… So all that we're asking these companies to do is, is to make it easily more accessible for Canadians to discover our Canadian artists, our Indigenous artists or Francophone artists," Guilbeault said.

Bill C-10 has been widely criticized by media and politicians from across the political spectrum for it's authoritarian and censorious approach to the internet and the free flow of information.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information