"These ablution facilities appear designed to single out one subset of the population for special treatment based on religion. That is illegal."
Abbott posted to X that the plan was “clearly illegal” from the start.
Abbott had said in a post to X on Friday, “Government-owned airports cannot favor one religion over all others. DFW plans to install Islamic wudu washing facilities are illegal. I've directed a review of all state grants to both airports for possible revocation, and referred DFW & IAH to USDOT for investigation. Texas will not allow illegal religious discrimination at taxpayer-funded facilities.”
"These ablution facilities appear designed to single out one subset of the population for special treatment based on religion. That is illegal," Abbott added in a statement.
Abbott ordered the review to examine whether state grant funds provided to both DFW and George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH) in Houston should be revoked and whether future grants should be denied over “illegal religious discrimination.” DFW had been evaluating a proposal to install ablution washing machines, while IAH already has one facility as well as an interconnected prayer room.
According to Fox News, the project was initially listed as privately funded with an estimated cost of $300,000. DFW Later said the design firm had mistakenly marked the project as privately funded and that airport funds, which are collected via revenue sources such as parking and concessions, would be used to fund the project. An airport spokesperson also said the actual cost would likely have been lower than the initial estimate.
DFW ultimately announced that it would not move forward with the project following increased public attention.
The controversy comes after DFW was reported to be considering a proposal to add ablution washing stations on the pre-security side of Terminal D, the airport’s international terminal.
“DFW was in the process of evaluating an internal proposal to add a set of ablution washing stations on the pre-security side of Terminal D, the international terminal. Like all proposed projects, the airport ultimately considers the operational benefits, customer service impacts, operational risks and costs before approving them,” the airport stated. “While that evaluation was planned, the airport accelerated its review due to elevated public interest this week and has determined not to proceed with the project as it would not deliver the originally anticipated operational benefits.”
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

Comments