img

JUST IN: Attorney for Colorado argues Trump is threat to democracy and voters need to be protected from him

"President Trump tried to disenfranchise 80 million Americans who voted against him, and the Constitution doesn't require that you be given another chance."

ADVERTISEMENT

"President Trump tried to disenfranchise 80 million Americans who voted against him, and the Constitution doesn't require that you be given another chance."

Image
Libby Emmons Brooklyn NY
ADVERTISEMENT
Jason Murray argued on behalf of the Colorado Supreme Court before the US Supreme Court on Thursday, stating his belief, and the ruling of the Colorado court, that the state has the right to remove a candidate from the presidential ballot. Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Murray about the right of the people to decide who they should vote for. 

"What about the idea that we should think about democracy?" Kavanaugh asked. "What do you think about the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice, of letting the people decide that. Because your position has the effect of disenfranchising voters to a significant degree, and should that be something? Does that come in when we think about, should we read Section 3 this way, or read it that way. What about the background principle, if you agree, of democracy?"

"I'd like to make three points on that Justice Kavanaugh," Murray said. "The first is that constitutional safeguards are for the purpose of safeguarding our democracy, not just for the next election cycle, but for generations to come. And second, Section 3 is designed to protect our democracy in that very way. The framers of Section 3 knew from painful experience that those who had violently broken their oaths to the Constitution couldn't be trusted to hold power again because they could dismantle our constitutional democracy from within. And so they created a democratic safety valve.

"President Trump can go ask Congress to give them amnesty by two-thirds vote," Murray said, "but unless he does that, our Constitution protects us from insurrectionists. And third, this case illustrates the danger of refusing to apply Section 3 as written, because the reason we're here is that President Trump tried to disenfranchise 80 million Americans who voted against him, and the Constitution doesn't require that you be given another chance."
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information