Supreme Court backs qualified immunity for police officers
“It is so ordered....” said the Supreme Court in a pair of unsigned opinions overturning decisions from the lower courts of appeal.
“It is so ordered....” said the Supreme Court in a pair of unsigned opinions overturning decisions from the lower courts of appeal.

A pair of Supreme Court decisions came out today siding with police officers on the issue of qualified immunity, and the common theme of both cases was excessive force.
The issue of qualified immunity when it comes to law enforcement has been a topic of controversy since George Floyd's death last year. But generally speaking, the doctrine gives police officers protection from lawsuits, unless there's demonstrable proof that someone's rights were violated.
Democrat Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts, an opponent of qualified immunity in Congress, reacted with frustration to today's SCOTUS news.
Loading this lets X set cookies and collect data.
View on XBoth of these Supreme Court opinions were unsigned. According to law.com, the meaning of unsigned Supreme Court opinions were initially meant for "routine, non-controversial" matters. But by the time Chief Justice John Roberts came around, they came to designate divisive issues.
Here's the two issues decided on Monday.
In CNN's reporting they make note about how there were "two instances where the court wiped away lower court opinions that had granted qualified immunity to government officials, leading some to believe the court was moving in a new direction to chip away at the doctrine."
But today's decisions dash those hopes. When it comes to federal legislation, according to CNBC, congressional efforts at police reform "fell apart" last month as Republicans and Democrats couldn't come to an agreement.
Loading this lets Rumble set cookies and collect data.
View on RumbleLibby’s Desk
Commentary and must-reads from Libby’s desk, straight to your inbox.
TPM Newsletter
The Post Millennial’s top stories, delivered to your inbox.