img

Bill criminalizing 'fraudulent medical theories' on social media introduced New York state Democrat senator

The bill "Prohibits the knowing and reckless promotion of unlawful or false material and providing remedies for the violation of such prohibition."

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Nick Monroe Cleveland Ohio
ADVERTISEMENT

A New York state senator wants to punish social media companies over "harmful content," and their definition of the phrase extends to any false facts that can be interpreted as endangering public safety. The bill does not provide an understanding as to the basis for making the determination that the information is "false."

The basis of the bill is that social media companies would be forbidden from having content promoted that advocates things like use of force or self-harm, but also anything that "includes a false statement of fact or fraudulent medical theory that is likely to endanger the safety or health of the public."

Democrat Brad Hoylman first introduced S7568 last month. But given the language of the bill he’s talking about it once again — as Capitol riot stories intensify leading up to the one year anniversary of January 6, 2021.

It’s framed as an anti-section 230 proposal designed to punish social media companies for the societal impact of their algorithms. His interpretation is that algorithmic elevation of key pieces of online content is a separate action not covered under the Communications Decency Act.

Per Hoylman’s press release:

"Social media algorithms are specially programmed to spread disinformation and hate speech at the expense of the public good. The prioritization of this type of content has real life costs to public health and safety. So when social media push anti-vaccine falsehoods and help domestic terrorists plan a riot at the U.S.  Capitol, they must be held accountable. Our new legislation will force social media companies to be held accountable for the dangers they promote."

The Senator cites Frances Haugen to justify his bill. He believes the findings presented by the Facebook whistleblower last year necessitate this kind of legislative action. Facebook has also said it is in favor of more government restrictions.

In the exact language of S7568 it says that enforcement is possible by the office of the attorney general, on behalf of the people of New York, and the same therein on a local level. In addition, "private rights of action" are permitted by private citizens.

The bill comes amid a wave of other big tech political backlash sparked by Twitter’s permanent suspension of Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information