A New York state senator wants to punish social media companies over "harmful content," and their definition of the phrase extends to any false facts that can be interpreted as endangering public safety. The bill does not provide an understanding as to the basis for making the determination that the information is "false."
The basis of the bill is that social media companies would be forbidden from having content promoted that advocates things like use of force or self-harm, but also anything that "includes a false statement of fact or fraudulent medical theory that is likely to endanger the safety or health of the public."
Our new legislation will force social media companies to be held accountable for the dangers they promote
— Senator Brad Hoylman (@bradhoylman) December 27, 2021
You can read the full bill here: https://t.co/DIshCZg43u
Democrat Brad Hoylman first introduced S7568 last month. But given the language of the bill he’s talking about it once again — as Capitol riot stories intensify leading up to the one year anniversary of January 6, 2021.
It’s framed as an anti-section 230 proposal designed to punish social media companies for the societal impact of their algorithms. His interpretation is that algorithmic elevation of key pieces of online content is a separate action not covered under the Communications Decency Act.
Per Hoylman’s press release:
"Social media algorithms are specially programmed to spread disinformation and hate speech at the expense of the public good. The prioritization of this type of content has real life costs to public health and safety. So when social media push anti-vaccine falsehoods and help domestic terrorists plan a riot at the U.S. Capitol, they must be held accountable. Our new legislation will force social media companies to be held accountable for the dangers they promote."
The Senator cites Frances Haugen to justify his bill. He believes the findings presented by the Facebook whistleblower last year necessitate this kind of legislative action. Facebook has also said it is in favor of more government restrictions.
In the exact language of S7568 it says that enforcement is possible by the office of the attorney general, on behalf of the people of New York, and the same therein on a local level. In addition, "private rights of action" are permitted by private citizens.
The bill comes amid a wave of other big tech political backlash sparked by Twitter’s permanent suspension of Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.
New York continues down a reckless road. https://t.co/VnFdPTpIdT
— James Lindsay, don't shout Covid in a crowded city (@ConceptualJames) January 4, 2022
https://t.co/pbwudds6mU
— Calvin Taylor #LearnMMT #opendemprimarys (@RealSOGAN) January 3, 2022
Lefties are for this or against this people like this ((D wf) stop voting dem or republican vote @CongressKate. (G)
ATTENTION ** ?@bradhoylman? and ?@nydems? are attempting to stifle free speech on SM in what they feel is " right and wrong". Is this a democracy or communism? @savetheuws ?@DonutShorts? ?@RezaC1?
— West Side Community Organization (@westsideco_org) December 28, 2021
NY State Senate Bill S7568 https://t.co/0VKWi8fcX4
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy