img

BREAKING: Alvin Bragg won't oppose Trump's move to delay NYC sentencing after SCOTUS immunity ruling, requests until July 24 to respond

"Although we believe defendant’s arguments to be without merit, we do not oppose his request for leave to file and his putative request to adjourn sentencing pending determination of his motion."

ADVERTISEMENT

"Although we believe defendant’s arguments to be without merit, we do not oppose his request for leave to file and his putative request to adjourn sentencing pending determination of his motion."

ADVERTISEMENT

Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's office said it won't oppose delaying the sentencing hearing against President Donald Trump, originally set for July 11. This comes after Trump's legal team filed motion to overturn the conviction against him due to the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of his immunity motion in the federal J6 case against him in Washington, DC. Bragg requested that his office be given until July 24 to respond.

Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records after Bragg alleged that Trump had classified payments to his then-attorney Michael Cohen as legal fees, when in fact, per Bragg, the monies were a reimbursement for Cohen's payments to a woman with whom Trump is alleged to have had an affair. For Bragg, this constituted election interference and was therefore a felony. Given that the Court stated that former presidents have immunity for official acts, and Bragg claimed Trump committed the crimes in service to his role as president, the immunity ruling could apply.

Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass responded to the Trump team in a letter from the DA's office, saying "We are in receipt of defendant's pre-motion letter dated July 1, 2024 seeking leave to file a motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL § 330.30(1) based upon the Supreme Court's July 1, 2024 decision in Trump v. United States, 2024."

"In that letter, defendant requested until July 10, 2024 to submit a memorandum of law in support of such motion. While defendant's letter states that he does 'not object to an adjournment of the July 11, 2024 sentencing date,' his request to file moving papers on July 10 is necessarily a request to adjourn the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for July 11, 2024 pending resolution of the motion," the letter from Steinglass added.

“Although we believe defendant’s arguments to be without merit, we do not oppose his request for leave to file and his putative request to adjourn sentencing pending determination of his motion. We respectfully request a deadline of July 24, 2024—two weeks after defendant's requested deadline—to file and serve a response," it concluded.

Per Judge Juan Merchan, who oversaw the case, sentencing has been moved to September 18 in New York. The presidential election is on November 5.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information