img

BREAKING: New York Appeals Court denies Trump's request to halt sentencing

"Your proposed order to show cause was reviewed by Judge Rivera, who declined to sign the order. As a result of the Judge’s determination, no motion is pending in the above titled at the Court of Appeals."

ADVERTISEMENT

"Your proposed order to show cause was reviewed by Judge Rivera, who declined to sign the order. As a result of the Judge’s determination, no motion is pending in the above titled at the Court of Appeals."

Image
Hannah Nightingale Washington DC
ADVERTISEMENT

The New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in the state, has denied Trump’s request to halt his sentencing in the falsified business records case. His sentencing is scheduled for Friday, and Trump has also requested the Supreme Court halt the sentencing.

In the two-sentence letter to Trump to Trump’s attorney, Chief Clerk Heather Davis wrote, "Your proposed order to show cause was reviewed by Judge Rivera, who declined to sign the order. As a result of the Judge’s determination, no motion is pending in the above titled at the Court of Appeals."



Trump filed the request with the New York Court of Appeals on Wednesday, the same day he filed his request with the Supreme Court. Ina. Thursday morning filing, prosecutors argued that the President-elect’s arguments to halt sentencing were "utterly baseless," ABC News reported.

"The President-elect is, by definition, not yet the President," the filing stated. "The President-elect therefore does not perform any Article II functions under the Constitution, and there are no Article II functions that would be burdened by ordinary criminal process involving the President-elect."

Trump is scheduled to be sentenced on Friday morning. Judge Juan Merchan has said that Trump can appear virtually for the hearing, and wrote that "it seems proper at this juncture to make known the Court's inclination to not impose any sentence of incarceration, a sentence authorized by the conviction but one the People concede they no longer view as a practicable recommendation."

"As such, in balancing the aforementioned considerations in conjunction with the underlying concerns of the Presidential immunity doctrine, a sentence of an unconditional discharge appears to be the most viable solution to ensure finality and allow Defendant to pursue his appellate options."

This is a breaking story. Please refresh the page for updates. 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2025 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information