img

Canadian judge annuls forced marriage to boss’ relative

A Sikh Woman was told she’d be fired if she didn’t marry boss’s Indian relative so he could immigrate to Canada.

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Ali Taghva Montreal QC
ADVERTISEMENT

Pardeep Kaur, a Sikh woman who was allegedly forced into a marriage with her boss’s relative upon threat of being fired from her job if she didn’t comply, has won an annulment in B.C. Supreme Court, according to an article in the Surrey Now leader.

The B.C. Supreme Court published Justice Gordon Weatherill's decision on Monday, January 21st.

According to the decision, Pardeep's boss suggested she marry his relative, Harpreet Singh Jhamb, who was living in India and whom the boss had  sponsored to immigrate to Canada as a permanent resident.

The Judged noted that Pardeep's boss “told the claimant that her employment with the company would be secure only if she accepted this suggestion” and that Kaur had asked him for a day to think about it, “as she was neither willing nor ready for marriage.

“The following day,” the judge said, “the claimant agreed to marry the respondent under duress, as she did not want to lose her job.”

Eighteen days later, Kaur and Jhamb were married in a civil ceremony attended by some of B.S.S.’s friends and family.

“Immediately after the ceremony, the claimant went home alone,” Weatherill noted. “She has not seen the respondent since. The marriage was not consummated.”

The Judge also noted that "the parties belong to the Sikh religion and are Punjabi by ethnicity.  According to the Sikh religion, in addition to a civil marriage ceremony, it is essential that there be a religious ceremony in front of the holy book, Shri Guru Granth Sahib, prior to cohabitation and/or consummation of the marriage. No such religious ceremony took place."

Kaur was fired from her job soon after the civil ceremony.

“She believes she was fired because she did not go through with the religious ceremony.”

The judge said he had “overwhelming evidence” before him that the civil marriage ceremony was “a sham and was entered into solely for immigration purposes.

“I am satisfied that the claimant did not enter into the agreement to participate in this sham of her own free will but did so because of the threat of losing her job,” Weatherill decided. “I find that she was coerced into marrying the respondent and participated in the civil ceremony under duress.”

What do you think about this story? Join the conversation by commenting below!

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information