img

Federal Judge Talwani blocks Trump, Congress from cutting Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood

Talwani wrote that "legislative history and context confirm that the law’s purpose is to single out Planned Parenthood Federation and its Members for punishment."

ADVERTISEMENT

Talwani wrote that "legislative history and context confirm that the law’s purpose is to single out Planned Parenthood Federation and its Members for punishment."

Image
Hannah Nightingale Washington DC
ADVERTISEMENT

A federal judge in Massachusetts has granted an emergency motion for a preliminary injunction barring the Trump administration from cutting federal Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood as the case plays out.

US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Judge Indira Talwani wrote in the 58-page ruling, "Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable. In particular, restricting Members’ ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs."

The provision to halt Medicaid funds going to Planned Parenthood was part of the Big Beautiful Bill that Congress passed and Trump signed into law on July 4. Talwani had initially blocked the provision for 14 days earlier in July.

Talwani wrote that "legislative history and context confirm that the law’s purpose is to single out Planned Parenthood Federation and its Members for punishment."

The suit was brought forward by Planned Parenthood Federation of America on behalf of its 47 regional affiliates, with additional suits being brought forth by its Utah and Massachusetts chapters. The suits took issue with a provision in the law that issues a one-year ban on Medicaid payments to health care nonprofits that also offer abortions, which also received more than $800,000 in federal funding in 2023.

"A preliminary injunction maintains Planned Parenthood Members’ ability to seek Medicaid reimbursements — and maintain their status quo level of service to patients," Talwani wrote. 

Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon told The Hill following the ruling, "We strongly disagree with the court’s decision. States should not be forced to fund organizations that have chosen political advocacy over patient care. This ruling undermines state flexibility and disregards longstanding concerns about accountability."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2025 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information