After an Iranian nuclear scientist was killed in an apparent ambush near Tehran on Friday, former CIA Director John Brennan said that it was a "criminal act & highly reckless." He said it "risks lethal retaliation & a new round of regional conflict." Brennan said that Iranian leaders should wait until Biden is in office, and not engage with the Trump administration:
"Iranian leaders would be wise to wait for the return of responsible American leadership on the global stage & to resist the urge to respond against perceived culprits."
This was a criminal act & highly reckless. It risks lethal retaliation & a new round of regional conflict.
— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) November 27, 2020
Iranian leaders would be wise to wait for the return of responsible American leadership on the global stage & to resist the urge to respond against perceived culprits. https://t.co/0uZhyBTM3S
The death of the scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, was alleged by Iran's foreign minister to bear "serious indications" of Israeli interference. Fakhrizadeh was named as the "leader of the Islamic Republic’s disbanded military nuclear program," according to the AP.
Brennan went on to say that he didn't know "whether a foreign government authorized or carried out the murder of Fakhrizadeh," but that if so, it would be "state sponsored terrorism," and a "flagrant violation of international law." For Brennan, this would "encourage more governments" to behave in a similar fashion.
He said that the killing of Fakhrizadeh was different than other "strikes against terrorist leaders & operatives," in that terrorist groups, unlike Iran, are not sovereign nations.
These assassinations are far different than strikes against terrorist leaders & operatives of groups like al-Qaida & Islamic State, which are not sovereign states. As illegitimate combatants under international law, they can be targeted in order to stop deadly terrorist attacks.
— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) November 27, 2020
The reaction from conservative Twitter was swift and fierce. OANN's Jack Posobiec pointed out that Brennan's actions during his time in the CIA negated his current outrage.
Now we know why you killed all those Sunni Muslims
— Jack Posobiec ?? (@JackPosobiec) November 27, 2020
Newsmax's Benny Johnson said that Fakhrizadeh was a terrorist, and that it was unreasonable for Brennan to be "this angry" about his death.
Imagine being this angry about a dead terrorist https://t.co/o557AIjM4G
— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 27, 2020
Commentators Mike Cernovich and David Reaboi had similar takes, saying that Brennan was responsible for civilian deaths, and that his worry over Fakhrizadeh was misplaced given his own actions.
I used to think the anti-Semitic stuff was a talking point but it’s just not. Look at this fucking tweet. Brennan himself is a monster who authorized killing civilians, but is now mad a terrorist was taken out?
— Cerno (@Cernovich) November 27, 2020
Not that hard to figure out why.
?? https://t.co/KbirPaMJqt
Journalist Glenn Greenwald, founder and formerly of The Intercept, agreed with Brennan, but still took issue with his outrage, saying the recently pardoned General Flynn had given a similar message to Russia during the last presidential transition, in 2016. Greenwald suggested that perhaps Brennan should be tried under the Logan Act.
To be clear, I agree with Brennan about this strike and also think it’s fine for private citizens like him to work in the transition against current US policy to tamp down tensions this way.
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) November 27, 2020
That’s why the FBI investigation of Flynn, as a *transition official*, was so abusive.
The Logan Act "is a 1799 law that calls for the fine or imprisonment of private citizens who attempt to intervene without authorization in disputes or controversies between the United States and foreign governments." Brennan's selective outrage unwittingly shows how General Flynn was railroaded, since Brennan himself could now be investigated for "Logan Act violations."
Dov Hikind, former State Assemblyman in New York, questioned if killing of Fakhrizadeh was "as reckless as allowing Iran to obtain" nuclear weapons, and helping foot the bill.
Is it as reckless as allowing Iran to obtain nukes and sending them cash to do so?! ? https://t.co/UJK68W0pdl
— Dov Hikind (@HikindDov) November 27, 2020
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy