"First thing, Rachel, you and I are gonna go shopping."
Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll has big plans for the $83 million she was awarded after winning a defamation suit against Donald Trump.
She was asked by Rachel Maddow how she would use the money to "shore up women's rights," something that Carroll has said was her goal.
"You've talked about using some of Trump's money, that you're about to get, to help shore up women's rights," Maddow said. "Do you know what that might be? What that might look like?"
"Yes, Rachel, yes," Carroll gushed.
"Tell me!" Maddow said.
"I have such great ideas for all the good I'm going to do with this money," Carroll said while Maddow laughed.
"First thing, Rachel, you and I are gonna go shopping. We're gonna get completely new wardrobes, new shoes," and she talked about getting a motorcycle for one of her attorneys and a fishing rod for the other as they all beamed.
"Rachel, what do you want? Penthouse?" Carroll asked. "It's yours!"
"Nothing," Maddow chuckled.
"Penthouse and France? You want France?" Carroll asked. "You wanna go fishing in France?" Maddow shook her head. "No? Alright."
"That's a joke," her lawyer interjected.
"If me fishing in France could do something for women's rights I would take the hit," Maddow said. "I would obviously take one for the team."
Maddow, Carroll, and her attorneys all had a nice big laugh over that one.
Carroll won $83 million in a defamation suit against Donald Trump after he claimed she was nuts for saying he raped her, which he has staunchly, consistently and firmly said he did not do.
Carroll claimed he raped her in the iconic Bergdorf Goodman department store some time in the mid 1990s, though she has never provided either an exact date or an exact year.
She brought the accusations in 2019 when Trump was president, right after she released a book. The book sales were pretty poor until the accusations were made and then they really picked up.
A jury determined that Trump "sexually assaulted" Carroll but did not rape her, and they made the determination in a civil case where the bar is so low that no evidence needed to be provided to prove Carroll's claim.
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy
Comments