BREAKING: Forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems alleging fraud ordered released by Michigan judge

Attorney Matthew DePerno told the court that "We believe that public interest in seeing what we discovered and what we say in the report would outweigh any potential harm to Dominion software."

The report on the forensic audit read: "The purpose of this forensic audit is to test the integrity of Dominion Voting System in how it performed in Antrim County, Michigan for the 2020 election.

"We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.

"The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.

"Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified."

This study was the result of a visit to the Antrim County Clerk's office to review the Antrim County election management server and its software, compact flash cars, memory sticks used by both by Dominion "voter assist terminals," and those used for the poll book.

As a result of this examination, the investigators found that "that votes can be and were changed during the second machine counting."

"That should be impossible," they noted.

Additionally, the machines hadn't been updated with the newest software, which contained security updates. The software was more than two years out of date.

The investigators found that the administrator user account for the machines was a security risk as well, and that "The user logged in has the ability to make major changes to the system and install software."

The report stated that "...the Dominion systems classifies ballots into two categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots. Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved between different Results Tally and Reporting (RTR) terminals with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch.

"This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity because it provides no meaningful observation of the adjudication process or audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicated the ballots."

The report said that "A staggering number of votes required adjudication." And went on to say that "This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, or audit trail."

"The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to system machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally design to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots into bulk adjudication."

A video shows how easy it would be to scan blank ballots and assign them to a particular candidate.

Once the blank ballot is scanned, and given to be adjudicated by the machine, an administrator is able to assign votes to that ballot as they see fit.