Dillon’s proposal would bar federal agents from using city property as a staging area for immigration purposes, using covered locations for surveillance, and from using the locations as “staging areas, coordination points, operations bases, and more.”
According to the Center Square, Councilmember Paul Dillon introduced the idea on Monday, the day after the Trump administration was reportedly renewing efforts to cut federal funding to so-called sanctuary jurisdictions, cities, counties, and states that restrict cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities. Spokane already has a related ordinance on the books. Last August, the city passed a law allowing officials to designate certain areas as “nonpublic,” a status intended to prevent federal agents from entering without permission or a warrant.
If adopted, Dillon’s “immigration enforcement free zones” would bar federal agents from using city property as a staging area for immigration purposes, prohibit agents from using covered locations for surveillance, and prohibit them from using the locations as “staging areas, coordination points, operations bases, and more.”
The measure would still allow entry under limited conditions: federal agents could enter only with a judicial warrant or with signed approval from the mayor. Dillon’s proposal comes after a man who had missed several immigration check-ins since 2023 was detained with his 10-year-old daughter.
Dillon also wants city officials to identify city-owned sites that could be covered by the policy, including parking lots, vacant lots, garages, and other facilities. Under his definition, “city property” would include “any real or personal property, land, building, facility, structure, equipment, or space owned, leased, operated, or controlled by the city.” The proposal’s description indicates it would include homeless shelters, transit facilities, public parks, and other city-controlled properties.
Councilmember Zack Zappone said he would like Spokane to expand beyond Dillon’s approach by preventing the city from hiring Trump-era immigration agents as local police officers in the future. But a similar proposal appears to be losing momentum in Olympia. House Bill 2641 would have barred law enforcement agencies in Washington from employing officers who began working for the US
Immigration and Customs Enforcement after Trump’s second-term inauguration on Jan. 20, 2025, but as of Wednesday it is not expected to move forward in the Legislature this year.
Dillon’s proposal is similar to that of Socialist Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, who issued an order last week for the Seattle Police to investigate, verify, and document Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity, expand legal and financial support for illegal immigrants, and prohibit ICE agents from operating on city property.
In response to Wilson’s order, Seattle Police Officers’ Guild President Mike Solan said, "Toothless virtue signaling rhetoric like this has already cost two people their lives. The concept of pitting two armed law enforcement agencies against each other is ludicrous and will not happen. I will not allow SPOG members to be used as political pawns."
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

Comments
2026-02-05T15:58-0500 | Comment by: Jeanne
What idiot bureaucrats, frankly. I’m 3.5 Hours from Spokane. This statement ensures I will NEVER visit this place again, but will shop in other cities that ADHERE to the law. IMHO, this is traitorous, supports criminals and crime, breaks an oath to uphold the constitution, but, ultimately, blatantly shows that they’re not playing with a full deck. SMH.