img

White House reporter demands to know why Biden hasn't federalized National Guard to escalate tensions at Texas border

"At what point does the President step in and say, 'enough of that, these are American soldiers. I am federalizing the National Guard."

ADVERTISEMENT

"At what point does the President step in and say, 'enough of that, these are American soldiers. I am federalizing the National Guard."

Image
Hannah Nightingale Washington DC
ADVERTISEMENT

A White House correspondent on Friday pressed Karine Jean-Pierre, Biden’s press secretary, over why the President hasn’t stepped in and federalized the National Guard so he can stand them down and allow Border Patrol in, as Texas has blocked Border Patrol from coming in to cut razor wire in Eagle Pass, Texas.

"At a certain point, Texas guard — Texas National Guard soldiers and National Guard soldiers from other states are being used to frustrate federal authority. They are being used to get in the way of federal immigration enforcement and to flout a court order from a federal court," said the reporter, believed to be White House correspondent Andrew Feinberg of The Independent.



"At what point does the President step in and say, 'enough of that, these are American soldiers. I am federalizing the National Guard and ordering them to let the Border Patrol do their jobs because they took an oath to the Constitution, and I am their commander in chief.’ When does that — when does enough become enough?"

Jean-Pierre responded, "I'm not going to speculate on any actions the President could use. I'm just not, I'm just not going to do that."

She added that she was going to "reiterate" that "if these Republican governors actually cared about doing something to deal with the challenges at the border" they would "reach out to their representatives, their congressional representatives, you know, their Senators and Congress members in their state."

Fox News national correspondent Bill Melugin wrote that Feinberg should "explain how Texas is “flouting” a court order that determined nothing about what Texas can or cannot do?

It simply means the feds can remove wire - and TX can keep placing it - while the merits of the underlying case are being litigated in fed court."



On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that Biden's Border Patrol agents are allowed to cut razor wire set up by Texas along the southern border to slow the flood of illegal immigrants that have crossed into the US under the Biden administration.

On Friday, a senior CBP official claimed that " Border Patrol has no plans to remove infrastructure (c-wire) placed by Texas along the border. Our posture remains the same."

25 states have expressed support of Texas in the crisis, as the state has been in a legal standoff with the Biden administration for several months over the border crisis.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information