
The FTC is seeking details about the Washington, DC-based nonprofit’s interactions with groups that monitor hate speech and misinformation in media.
According to a document reviewed by Reuters, the FTC is seeking details about the Washington, DC-based nonprofit’s interactions with groups that monitor hate speech and misinformation in media.
The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) is one of those groups, an initiative of the World Federation of Advertisers. Both GARM and Media Matters are facing lawsuits from X.
Last year, X filed suit in Texas federal court, alleging that the World Federation of Advertisers and several major brands unlawfully worked together to pull ad dollars from the platform.
The companies accused of collusion have denied wrongdoing and have asked a judge to dismiss the case.
The FTC’s demand also calls for Media Matters to turn over all documents it produced or received in connection with the X lawsuit related to advertiser boycotts.
X, under Elon Musk’s ownership since 2022, has blamed Media Matters for defamation and financial harm. In 2023, X filed a separate lawsuit accusing the nonprofit of misrepresenting the platform by claiming that major brand advertisements were shown next to extremist content.
In response, Media Matters filed its own legal complaint, claiming X was using the courts to silence the organization for its reporting. "Media Matters has denied the allegations, and sued X, accusing it of abusive, costly and meritless lawsuits to punish the group for its reporting on advertising on X after Musk purchased the site." The nonprofit said the legal fight has cost it millions of dollars.
While the FTC has not confirmed an investigation is underway, Chairman Andrew Ferguson previously pointed to possible concerns. "We must prosecute any unlawful collusion between online platforms, and confront advertiser boycotts which threaten competition among those platforms," he said in December while addressing another case.
The FTC’s demand, while serious, does not mean Media Matters has broken any laws. A civil investigative demand is a tool regulators use to gather information and does not automatically lead to enforcement action.
This is a breaking news story. Refresh for updates.
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy
Comments