img

BREAKING VERDICT: Freedom Convoy protesters Chris Barber and Tamara Lich found guilty on mischief charges

Lich and Barber were charged with mischief, counseling others to commit mischief, intimidation and obstructing police as leaders of the Freedom Convoy that polarized residents of Ottawa in February 2022 and arguably began to roll back Covid-19 mandates. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Lich and Barber were charged with mischief, counseling others to commit mischief, intimidation and obstructing police as leaders of the Freedom Convoy that polarized residents of Ottawa in February 2022 and arguably began to roll back Covid-19 mandates. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Ontario judge Heather Perkins-McVey has found Freedom Convoy organizers Chris Barber and Tamara Lich guilty on mischief charges in Ottawa's provincial courthouse Thursday. Charges of counseling to commit mischief were stayed. The judge found Barber and Lich not guility on charges of commiting intimidation or counseling to commit intimidation.j Perkin-McVey also found Barber and Lich not guilty of obstructing or counseling to obstruct police officers. Barber was found guilty on a separate charge of disobeying a court order.

Lich and Barber were charged with mischief, counseling others to commit mischief, intimidation and obstructing police as leaders of the Freedom Convoy that polarized residents of Ottawa in February 2022 and arguably began to roll back Covid-19 mandates.

"Better afternoon than morning, that's for sure," Lawrence Greenspon, counsel for Tamara Lich, told The Post Millennial after over six hours of a verdict reading. "Yes, was it meatloaf, who said two out of three, five out of six a'in't bad? I can't comment on the mischief charge, or any of the aspects of the judge's decision while the matter is still pending for sentence. And that's about all I can tell you at this point."

The judge said she read the book "The Right to Protest: an Uneasy Balance" in reaching her verdict, and asked when does the right to protest "protect those from criminal liability" or or allow the them to infringe on "the right of other citizens to enjoy their property? Charter rights are not absolute." She recessed the court for a lunch break before finishing the rest of her verdict on the remaining charges.

"There is no doubt their statements for telling people to stay strong, hold the line, stay united, not to give in to fear, to come and stand with them and other walks, those statements I find are meant to incite their followers to continue to do what they were doing, which was the blocking of streets or continuing initiative, while at the same time trying to make your political views known. They said these things to their followers on a regular basis, given that these were not off cut statements ... these statements I find were made to incite or rally the followers of the Freedom convoy to stay or come to Ottawa and continue the protest," Perkins-McVey told the court.

Greenspon had always insisted the charges were an affront to basic free speech rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights. “The Crown seeks to criminalize the words and actions of leaders of a protest, a protest in which those leaders consistently urged others to be peaceful and to cooperate with police,” Lawrence Greenspon said. “The Crown asks that those leaders be held criminally responsible for the actions of unidentified others who were directed into the downtown core of Ottawa and they were allowed to stay for a three week period of time without so much as a single parking ticket being issued to anyone.”

“It was only after the two leaders had been arrested that any arguable obstruction took place. This is a case which the crown is referred to as overwhelming, and I submit the only thing that is overwhelming are the unprecedented resources that have been afforded for prosecution of the case,” Greenspon continued.

Greenspon argued that the Crown is seeking a unique judgment: “that is, to find a conspiracy based on a common lawful purpose and the acts of unidentified groups and individuals who carry out interference with downtown residents despite the repeated message of peaceful protest and cooperation with police.”

Lich had previously told The Post Millennial that she was prepared for a long legal battle. “Unfortunately for them, they picked on the wrong woman because I am not going to back down and they do not scare me and they do not intimidate me and so they have no power over me. But what they're trying to do is scare everybody else – right? Well, don't do this.”

But the activist said that’s not what Canada is all about and that’s what the Freedom Convoy showed the world.

“But, I mean, we're Canadians: some of the most positive people on the planet.”

In February, Barber told The Post Millennial: “I always say that I probably grew the most throughout the Freedom Convoy. I'm not an organizer, I'm not a protester, I'm not an activist; I'm just a blue collar truck driver. I run a famous red truck now and and every time I have that truck on the road, it's got the big Canada label down the hood on it, and I've [had] people yelling at me on the radio, people, it's hard to make a mile because you've always got somebody that wants to stop and have a conversation, but more than willing to do that. I've met so many amazing people across the country in the last three years, and I am very appreciative for all the support we have.”

“You know when we started organizing this we had no idea how it was going to take off and no idea that it would go global. You know that was a shock to us but it really did it and resonated all around the world.”

Lawyers for Lich and Barber presented their final summation in the trial last September. The duo were instrumental in organizing the Freedom Convoy trucker protest of January and February 2022, which galvanized opponents of Covid mandates. The protest was abruptly halted by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when he invoked the never-before-used Emergencies Act that brought down the full force of the police on the protest in the nation’s capital.

The trial began on Sept. 5, 2023. Greenspon told The Post Millennial a year later, as he made his concluding statements, that the trial was already the longest mischief trial in Canadian history.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2025 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information