Conservative campaign chair Walied Soliman wins defamation suit against 'far-right' commentator Daniel Bordman

Mr. Soliman, a Muslim lawyer who was chair of O'Toole's leadership campaign and 2021 election campaign won $500,000 in damages afer Bordman suggested that Soliman was a supporter of terrorism

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Adam Dobrer Vancouver
ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Soliman, a Muslim lawyer who was chair of O'Toole's leadership campaign and 2021 election campaign won $500,000 in damages afer Bordman suggested  that Soliman was a supporter of terrorism over a series of statements and videos made between 2019 and 2020.

Judge Perrell's summary decision notes that "Mr. Bordman has not published, taught, or studied in the area of national security, terrorism, or international relations," and that he "has no formal education in journalism". Scathingly, "Mr. Bordman [had] no notes or records of his investigation of Mr. Soliman" nor did he "contact or attempt to contact Mr. Soliman for comment before broadcasting his statements."  

Mr. Bordman has a long history of mocking, ridiculing, scorning and deriding in his video broadcasts. As an exmample, on his February 1, 2020 broadcast of his program "The Worst of CBC", he appears wearing a bath towel.

Daniel Bordman wearing a bath towel to mock Islamic culture 

Judge Perrell found Bordman issued three categories of defamatory statements: that  Mr.Soliman supports "extermist, terrorist Islamic organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood"; that he is an anti-Semite and “hides his anti-Semitism from his Jewish law partners”; and that he “supports the introduction of Sharia law to Canada to supplant or override Canadian law.” Perell noted that Bordman "made false statements of facts and not comments or opinions, and, thus the defence of fair comment is not available to him."

Perell found that Bordman “made false statements of fact and not comments or opinions, and, thus, the defence of fair comment is not available to him," while also rejecting the defence responsible communication, because Bordman failed to take reasonable steps "to ensure the overall accuracy of [his] factual assertions.

The ruling is expected to be significant for a growing body of American and Canadian case law that heavily penalizes defamatory statements published on social media and other internet platforms.

At time of writing, Daniel Bordman remains listed as a  contributor on The National Telegraph (TNT) website.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information