
"This bill is a catastrophe not just for residents and housing providers, but for the entire state economy.”
While the final version of the bill caps rent increases at 10 percent plus inflation — a rise from the original 7 percent — and exempts single-family homes, critics argue these concessions do little to salvage a fundamentally flawed policy that won’t address housing affordability in the state. State Senator Emily Alvado, the prime sponsor of the bill, is facing an ethics complaint for allegedly "engaging in activities incompatible with public duties and receiving compensation for official duties" for receiving a six-figure salary from Enterprise Community Partners, an affordable housing non-profit that gets taxpayer money from the state of Washington.
Earlier this year, the State Senate approved the final version 27-20, with two Democrats joining all Republicans in opposition. The House followed with a 54-44 vote, where five Democrats broke with their colleagues. No Republicans voted in favor of the flawed legislation.
Opponents warn that rent control does not solve homelessness or improve affordability. States like California, New York, and Oregon, where similar policies are in place, continue to grapple with spiraling homelessness and rising housing costs. These measures may stabilize rents for a select few, but they also signal to investors and developers that Washington is no longer a friendly place for housing investment.
"This bill is a catastrophe not just for residents and housing providers, but for the entire state economy,” said housing advocate Sean Flynn in an interview with KOMO News. “It’s a big, bright sign to investors not to put their money here because no investor wants to be in an environment where the returns can be capped artificially by a government.”
The damage won’t stop at big investors. Small landlords, who often provide the most affordable rental units, are expected to take the hardest hit. Unlike large corporations, these property owners don't have the financial flexibility to absorb profit losses. Faced with capped returns, many may choose to sell or leave the rental market entirely, further shrinking housing supply and making the crisis worse.
Flynn also emphasized that the law fails to address the real problem: a lack of housing units. “Rent control will not help that problem,” he said. “Because rent control doesn’t put any money back in your pocket.”
Rather than incentivizing the construction of new housing, HB 1217 punishes those who provide it. It creates a false sense of security while pushing the state further away from the real solution: increasing housing supply through smart zoning, streamlined permitting, and pro-development policies.
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy
Comments