minute read
ADVERTISEMENT
On Monday, Republican Iowa state Senator Sandy Salmon introduced a bill that would ban "Satanic displays or the practice of Satanism on state property."
The move comes just weeks after a controversial holiday display installed in the state Capitol by the Satanic Temple was vandalized by a Christian veteran, who has since been charged with a hate crime. The Satanic Temple says they do not believe in Satan but use the ethos of Satan to push for ritual abortion, to gain state-funding, and advocate for libertine lifestyles. They routinely sue public schools to force them to allow After School Satan Clubs across the US.
"The state or any political subdivision of the state shall not recognize organizations or individuals who refer to Satan as a deity, worship Satan, or who reference Satan or Satanism as part of the organization's or individual's religious practice as an establishment of religion," the bill reads.
The move comes just weeks after a controversial holiday display installed in the state Capitol by the Satanic Temple was vandalized by a Christian veteran, who has since been charged with a hate crime. The Satanic Temple says they do not believe in Satan but use the ethos of Satan to push for ritual abortion, to gain state-funding, and advocate for libertine lifestyles. They routinely sue public schools to force them to allow After School Satan Clubs across the US.
"The state or any political subdivision of the state shall not recognize organizations or individuals who refer to Satan as a deity, worship Satan, or who reference Satan or Satanism as part of the organization's or individual's religious practice as an establishment of religion," the bill reads.
"Displays, symbols, or the practice of Satanic worship shall not be allowed on public property, in public schools, on property owned by public schools, or on any property owned by the state or its political subdivisions," it continues, adding that, "any act of Satanic practice or worship that involves the ending of a life or the shedding of blood, whether the sacrifice be an animal or human, is prohibited."
Salmon goes on to argue that "evil is personified in the creature known as Satan," and that, "it is the duty of the government to play an appropriate role in protecting the inhabitant residents of Iowa from evil while encouraging and facilitating good."
"It is legally and constitutionally inconsistent," she claims, "to afford Satan, who is universally understood to be an enemy of God, religious expression on public property by a state government that depends upon God for continued blessings. Such a legal view violates our state constitution and offends the God upon whom we depend and undermines our well-being."
While Salmon has received support from other likeminded believers, her bill has drawn the ire of many prominent non-Christians, who argue it violates citizens' freedom of religion. Hemant Mehta, for example, called it a "blatantly illegal" attempt by Christian lawmakers to "promote their faith while denigrating others."
Satanic Temple co-founder Lucien Greaves warned Salmon that, "while you might not like public displays of one type, there is a whole unraveling that takes place when you start allowing the government to pick and choose which forms of expression they agree with, narrow their definition of what they think an appropriate religion is, and also try to give nonbelief in general a lower tier in citizenship."
The group was not founded as a religion and was intended first and foremost to be a protest against organized religion.
If passed, the bill would amend existing laws to make violating the aforementioned rules a criminal offense subject to prosecution.
Salmon goes on to argue that "evil is personified in the creature known as Satan," and that, "it is the duty of the government to play an appropriate role in protecting the inhabitant residents of Iowa from evil while encouraging and facilitating good."
"It is legally and constitutionally inconsistent," she claims, "to afford Satan, who is universally understood to be an enemy of God, religious expression on public property by a state government that depends upon God for continued blessings. Such a legal view violates our state constitution and offends the God upon whom we depend and undermines our well-being."
While Salmon has received support from other likeminded believers, her bill has drawn the ire of many prominent non-Christians, who argue it violates citizens' freedom of religion. Hemant Mehta, for example, called it a "blatantly illegal" attempt by Christian lawmakers to "promote their faith while denigrating others."
Satanic Temple co-founder Lucien Greaves warned Salmon that, "while you might not like public displays of one type, there is a whole unraveling that takes place when you start allowing the government to pick and choose which forms of expression they agree with, narrow their definition of what they think an appropriate religion is, and also try to give nonbelief in general a lower tier in citizenship."
The group was not founded as a religion and was intended first and foremost to be a protest against organized religion.
If passed, the bill would amend existing laws to make violating the aforementioned rules a criminal offense subject to prosecution.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy
Comments