Jack Smith may have to rewrite Trump indictment after SCOTUS J6 ruling: legal analyst

The ruling is likely to have an effect on the indictment against Trump related to his actions on January 6, as two of the four charges are based on this obstruction law the Supreme Court has ruled was misapplied to a protester.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

The Supreme Court's decision in Fischer v. United States, which sided with a protester charged with obstructing an official proceeding on January 6, could have a significant impact on Special Counsel Jack Smith's DC indictment of Donald Trump.  

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett highlighted this on Fox News, stating, "330 people who were falsely prosecuted will probably have their convictions either tossed or modified, but for Donald Trump, it may mean that Jack Smith now has to rewrite his indictment."   

“I guarantee you that Smith is furious, right this minute, digesting [the Supreme Court decision] because it could potentially gut the special counsel’s case,” Jarrett added.  

The recent decision by the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a protester who entered the capitol on January 6 and was charged with obstructing an official proceeding under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1512(c)(2).   

According to the court, in order for the protesters to be charged under this statute, the government must “establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or as we earlier explained, other things used in the proceeding, or attempted to do so.”  

The ruling is likely to have an effect on the indictment against Trump related to his actions on January 6, as two of the four charges are based on this obstruction law that the Supreme Court has ruled was misapplied to protesters. The indictment from Smith stated that "Donald J. Trump did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with co-conspirators, known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to corruptly obstruct and impede an official proceeding, that is, the certification of the electoral vote, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1512(c)(2)."  

Smith’s indictment of Trump may also prove futile as the country awaits the imminent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Bob

These cheatocrats knew they were stretching the law the whole time and couldn't have cared less. They'll do anything -- anything-- to accomplish their agenda.

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information