img

Judge Boasberg considers holding Trump admin officials in contempt over deportation flights

Boasberg said he believes the administration was trying to avoid legal scrutiny when Trump sent the suspected gang members to El Salvador.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boasberg said he believes the administration was trying to avoid legal scrutiny when Trump sent the suspected gang members to El Salvador.

ADVERTISEMENT
US District Judge James Boasberg is considering whether to hold Trump administration officials in contempt of court after three deportation flights filled with suspected MS-13 and Tren de Aragua gang members were sent to El Salvador as the judge gave an order to have the flights turn around. The three that made it to El Salvador were in progress when the order was written.

Boasberg claimed the administration appeared to act “in bad faith,” by deporting the flights full of suspected gang members while legal proceedings were still being arranged to review the legality of the removals. Trump had the removals go forward with the invoking of the Alien Enemies Act.

In a hearing on Thursday, Boasberg said he is weighing penalties he could impose should he hold officials in contempt for the deportation flights that were carried out on March 15. Boasberg did not, however, name any specific officials. One such penalty could be ordering the administration to return the foreign nationals back to the US, according to a report by Politico.

The Obama-appointed judge raised concerns about the Trump administration’s behavior as well as officials’ refusal to give him a timeline on how events played out before and after he gave the order.

The Trump administration argued in a previous court hearing that they had followed Boasberg’s written order, which had occurred after he gave an oral order for the deportations to stop.

Boasberg, an Obama-appointed judged, took the action with the order as part of a broader legal fight over Trump’s use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, which has usually been used in wartime. It has been used three other times in history aside from Trump’s invocation of the act in March.

While it is rare for an executive branch official to be held in contempt, it has happened in the past.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2025 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information