img

NEW: House Judiciary sues Biden's AG to obtain Hur recordings

The subpoena issued for Garland is "required, and still requires, Defendant Garland to produce the documents and records as set forth in Schedule A of the Subpoena."

ADVERTISEMENT

The subpoena issued for Garland is "required, and still requires, Defendant Garland to produce the documents and records as set forth in Schedule A of the Subpoena."

Image
Hannah Nightingale Washington DC
ADVERTISEMENT

The House Committee on the Judiciary on Monday filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Merrick Garland to obtain the audio tapes of Biden’s interview with special counsel Robert Hur in the classified documents investigation. This comes as the House is set to vote on holding Garland in inherent contempt in the upcoming session. 

The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, stated that the subpoena issued for Garland is "required, and still requires, Defendant Garland to produce the documents and records as set forth in Schedule A of the Subpoena, including the audio recordings of the Special Counsel’s interviews with President Biden and Mark Zwonitzer." 

"The Judiciary Committee has attempted to make reasonable accommodations for Garland’s production, including by agreeing to review two documents in camera and extending the return date of the Subpoena three times, but those efforts are at an impasse, and Garland continues to refuse to produce the audio recordings of the Special Counsel’s interviews with President Biden and Mark Zwonitzer." 

"There is no lawful basis for Garland’s refusal to produce to the Committee the audio recordings of the Special Counsel’s interviews with President Biden and Mark Zwonitzer." 

"Garland violated, and continues to violate, his legal obligation by refusing to produce to the Committee the audio recordings of the Special Counsel’s interviews with President Biden and Mark Zwonitzer when those recordings are not covered by executive privilege, and, even if they were, executive privilege has been waived,” the lawsuit added.  

The lawsuit stated that the Judiciary Committee has been and continues to be "injured by Garland’s refusal to produce the audio recordings." 

The committee asks that the court order Garland to hand over the audio recordings. 

Garland refused to hand over the subpoenaed recordings and was held in contempt of Congress. The Department of Justice refused to prosecute Garland. 

This is a breaking story. Please refresh the page for updates. 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information