img

Peter Navarro ordered to report to prison on March 19 to serve 4-month prison term

"Dr. Navarro has now been ordered to report to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, FCI Miami, on or before 2:00PM EDT on March 19, 2024," Navarro’s attorney wrote in court papers late Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

"Dr. Navarro has now been ordered to report to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, FCI Miami, on or before 2:00PM EDT on March 19, 2024," Navarro’s attorney wrote in court papers late Sunday.

Image
Hannah Nightingale Washington DC
ADVERTISEMENT

Peter Navarro, a former White House aide to President Donald Trump, has been ordered to report to a Miami prison on March 19 to begin serving his sentence. Navarro plans to continue his appeals to try to overturn his conviction.

Navarro was sentenced in January to four months in prison for not complying with a subpoena issued by the January 6 House Select Committee. He was convicted in the case in September, being found guilty of two counts of contempt of Congress.

According to Politico, Navarro has urged a federal appeals court to stay his sentence while he works to overturn his conviction.

"Dr. Navarro has now been ordered to report to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, FCI Miami, on or before 2:00PM EDT on March 19, 2024," Navarro’s attorney wrote in court papers late Sunday.

"Accordingly, Dr. Navarro respectfully reiterates his request for an administrative stay … Should this Court deny Dr. Navarro’s motion, he respectfully requests an administrative stay so as to permit the Supreme Court review of this Court’s denial."

In early February, United States District Court Judge Amit Mehta rejected his appeal to remain free while working to overturn the conviction, and ordered him to report to prison.

"Defendant insists that his prosecution was 'motivated by political bias'," Mehta wrote, "yet, he offers no actual proof to support that contention ... If anything, the record demonstrates just the opposite."

Mehta argued that Navarro's "cynical, self-serving claim of political bias poses no question at all, let alone a 'substantial' one" needed to fulfill the requirements for release.

Navarro’s team argued during the sentencing hearing that their client believed he could not comply with the committee’s subpoena due to executive privilege.

"When I received that congressional subpoena…I had an honest belief that the privilege had been invoked," Navarro said to US District Judge Amit Mehta.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information