img

3-month-old babies are racist, says Arizona Department of Education's 'equity' toolkit

The toolkit advises parents to begin speaking to their children about race "even before their children can speak."

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

The Arizona Department of Education has crafted an "equity" toolkit designed to teach critical race theory to children, offering a number of recommended readings on the topic.

The toolkit teaches, among other things, that babies start to become racist at just three months of age. The toolkit insists that babies must be spoken to about race, as "letting children draw their own conclusions based on what they see" leads to racism. It is unclear how allowing children to think for themselves leads to racism.

It also suggests that white children specifically are strongly biased in favour of their own race by the time they are five years old, but claimed that such a phenomenon does not exist among black and "latinx" children.

To solve this problem, the toolkit advises parents to begin speaking to their children about race "even before their children can speak."

It also suggests that schools need to take on a "proactive approach to teaching white students about race and racial identity" and that "race is an essential part of one's identity."

One of the recommended readings discusses the topic of white fragility, a racist Kafka trap whereby a white person disputing claims that they are a racist is taken as evidence of racism. The reading says that white people deny their own racism "to feel better about themselves."

Critical race theory originated in academia but is now being implemented in the curricula of schools across the United States.

There has been growing pushback against its adoption in schools, however, with parents taking legal action against school districts which implement it, alleging that it constitutes illegal discrimination.

One lawsuit in Nevada, which was brought forth by a widowed black mother, asserts that the woman's child was placed in "a deliberately designed, psychologically abusive dilemma: participate in the exercise in violation of his conscience and be branded with a pejorative label; or conscientiously refrain from participation, and suffer isolation from his classmates and be maligned by the same labeling regardless."

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information