BREAKING: Prosecution in freedom trucker trial admits protest wasn’t 'violent'

"We’re not saying that the Freedom Convoy was violent," crown attorney Siobhain Wetscher told the court.


The prosecution in the trial of Freedom Convoy figures Tamara Lich and Chris Barber admitted Wednesday that the anti-Covid mandate protest was “not violent.”

“We’re not saying that the Freedom Convoy was violent,” crown attorney Siobhain Wetscher told the court.

Wetscher said the Crown is arguing that there are “limitations to all of those [constitutional] rights” such as freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.

“The actions of the demonstrators were curtailed by the Criminal Code because those were limitations.”

The lawyer merely referred to the protest as “not peaceful.”

At this point, Judge Heather Perkins-McVey interjected, “But what we have is two people on trial and I think that’s an important distinction”

Earlier in day 30 of the trial, defense attorney Diane Magas presented evidence to the court and argued that both Lich and Barber had a constitutional right to continue their peaceful protest of the COVID-19 mandates even after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act. 

The pair are charged with mischief, counseling others to commit mischief, intimidation, and obstructing police as leaders of the Freedom Convoy that polarized residents of Ottawa in 2022 and arguably began to roll back Covid mandates.

Magas referenced the Emergencies Act legislation – that effectively imposes martial law on an area defined by the federal government – and noted that lawful protests are still allowed under the law.

“So lawful protest is in there as an exception to the implementation of the Emergencies Act. That's a very key factor."

The lawyer said it was irrelevant whether an agreement forged between the Freedom Convoy organizers and the police to move vehicles from the downtown core of Ottawa took effect before or after the invocation of the act.

She also continued to dispute the prosecution’s charge that Lich and Barber worked in concert and were “co-conspirators.”

On Tuesday, the prosecution attempted to prove that Lich’s rallying cry of “Hold the line” was somehow an invitation to commit a criminal act.

Eric Granger, who along with Lawrence Greenspon is representing Lich, argued the phrase had nothing to do with telling people to disobey the orders of police but everything to do with encouraging demonstrators in the face of overwhelming odds.

Granger noted that Ottawa police also used the phrase during the January to February 2022 protest. 

Sign in to comment


Powered by StructureCMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information