img

Canadian politician slammed after reading AI-generated text during legislative speech

“Here’s a more natural, flowing version of that section that reads like a legislative speech rather than a series of short points.”

“Here’s a more natural, flowing version of that section that reads like a legislative speech rather than a series of short points.”

Image
Roberto Wakerell-Cruz Montreal QC
A New Brunswick opposition MLA is facing criticism after appearing to read what observers say was AI-generated text during a speech in the provincial legislature, including a sentence that appeared to be an editing instruction from a chatbot.

Progressive Conservative MLA Bill Oliver was speaking last month against legislation that would establish a public advocate for energy utilities when he read the line: “Here’s a more natural, flowing version of that section that reads like a legislative speech rather than a series of short points.”

The remark went largely unnoticed at the time. Weeks later, however, a video clip circulated on Reddit, where users mocked the speech and questioned whether artificial intelligence had been used to prepare it.



One commenter wrote, “If there are no consequences for this, then we hold our high-schoolers to a higher standard than our elected officials.” Another added, “If he was a lawyer, he’d be sanctioned.” Other users described the incident as “amateur hour,” “idiotocracy,” “depressing,” and “good grief.”

Oliver's office did not respond to a request for comment, according to the original report.

The speech centered on legislation creating a public advocate for energy utilities. Earlier in the address, Oliver said, “Public confidence in the office of an advocate matters,” before later reading the apparent chatbot instruction aloud.

The wording resembles responses generated by large language models such as ChatGPT. The original report said that when the bill was entered into ChatGPT with instructions to draft an opposing speech in Oliver's style, the chatbot produced similar language. The report also said AI-detection service Pangram assessed the speech as being highly likely to have been AI-generated.

The episode comes amid broader scrutiny over the use of artificial intelligence in professional settings. Courts in multiple jurisdictions have addressed cases involving AI-generated legal filings containing fabricated citations, while schools, businesses, and governments continue developing policies governing the technology's use.
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2026 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy