img

Carney Liberals move to vastly expand birthright citizenship

The court heard arguments on the matter Thursday morning, and a decision is expected soon.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court heard arguments on the matter Thursday morning, and a decision is expected soon.

Image
Roberto Wakerell-Cruz Montreal QC
ADVERTISEMENT

The Carney Liberals are taking steps to address so-called "lost Canadians," a term used for individuals born outside Canada to Canadian parents who were also born abroad.

Immigration Minister Marc Miller has announced an interim citizenship program to help those affected, while a judge has questioned the lack of details on how the program will work, according to the Globe and Mail.



In 2009, the Conservative government changed citizenship laws to prevent Canadians born abroad from passing their citizenship to their children unless the child was born in Canada. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled in late 2023 that this law was unconstitutional, and the government agreed with the decision.

Since then, the federal government has received three deadline extensions to pass new legislation. Now, with the current deadline set to expire on March 19, Miller’s department is seeking a 12-month extension. While waiting for legislation, Miller announced that affected individuals born or adopted before December 19, 2023 will be eligible for discretionary citizenship grants. Those born or adopted after that date may also qualify if they have a Canadian citizen parent who has lived in Canada for at least three cumulative years.

This three-year requirement was part of previous legislation aimed at resolving the issue, but the bill died when Parliament was prorogued in January.

On March 13, Ontario Superior Court Justice Jasmine Akbarali extended the deadline temporarily, until April 25, but criticized the government for not providing enough details on how it would implement interim measures.

“There is no evidence of what policy will be adopted to implement its intention,” Akbarali stated in her decision. “There is no evidence about how any such policy will be communicated to people affected by the unconstitutional legislation.”

She added that more information is needed before granting a further extension.

Sujit Choudhry, a lawyer representing those who challenged the law, argued in court that the government should only receive a four-month extension rather than the requested 12 months. He suggested the longer request was due to the likelihood of an upcoming federal election. Choudhry pointed out that courts have granted four-month extensions in the past to allow governments to pass court-mandated legislation during election periods.

The federal government, in its court submission, warned that failing to pass new legislation before the deadline could result in some individuals automatically gaining citizenship while others remain excluded.

The court heard arguments on the matter Thursday morning, and a decision is expected soon.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2025 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information