img

FLASHBACK: Peter Navarro was barred from citing executive privilege in contempt of Congress case

The former Trump White House advisor was barred by a US District Judge from using executive privilege as a defense in the case.

ADVERTISEMENT

The former Trump White House advisor was barred by a US District Judge from using executive privilege as a defense in the case.

ADVERTISEMENT

The presiding judge over Peter Navarro’s court case barred him from claiming executive privilege to dismiss the charges. Navarro, who was charged with criminal contempt of Congress for his refusal to adhere to a subpoena from the January 6 committee, is now in prison facing a four-month sentence after being found guilty of two counts of contempt of Congress. 

Navarro's defense rested on his assertion that he refrained from complying with the subpoena under the belief that former President Trump had invoked executive privilege regarding their correspondence. However, US District Judge Amit Mehta rejected this argument, citing Navarro's failure to provide concrete evidence that Trump had indeed invoked such privilege, according to a Washington Post report from August.

Unlike former Trump aides Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino, who received legal counsel from Trump’s lawyer advising them to defy subpoenas based on executive privilege, Navarro reportedly failed to produce any documentation or directives from the President to support his claim.

"When I received that congressional subpoena…I had an honest belief that the privilege had been invoked," Navarro told US District Judge Amit Mehta.

Judge Mehta's ruling made it clear that without substantiated proof of executive privilege invocation, Navarro could not escape prosecution for contempt.

“Had the President issued a similar letter to Defendant, the record here would look very different,” Mehta wrote when he denied Navarro’s motion to dismiss the charges.

“Defendant has failed to come forward with any evidence to support the claimed assertion of privilege,” Mehta determined. “And, because the claimed assertion of privilege is unproven, Defendant cannot avoid prosecution for contempt.”

On Monday, Navarro made a last-ditch request to the Supreme Court to allow him to stay out of prison while his appeal process continues. However, on Monday morning, the Supreme Court denied Navarro’s request. Following the Supreme Court's decision, former President Trump expressed disappointment in Navarro being sent to prison by Biden's Department of Justice, labeling the decision as a "shame" and a "disgrace."

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information