img

Peter Navarro takes bid to avoid prison over contempt of Congress charge to Supreme Court

"The appeal is not for the purpose of delay and raises a substantial question of law"

ADVERTISEMENT

"The appeal is not for the purpose of delay and raises a substantial question of law"

ADVERTISEMENT

On Friday, former White House aide to Donald Trump, Peter Navarro, filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court to allow him to remain free while he appeals his contempt of Congress conviction.  

In the filings, Navarro argued that the hold on his sentence is warranted because he does not pose a flight risk, or pose a danger to society, and "that the appeal is not for the purpose of delay and raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in... reversal, an order for a new trial." 

"For the first time in our nation’s history, a senior presidential advisor has been convicted of contempt of Congress after asserting executive privilege over a congressional subpoena," the document said. "Dr. Navarro has appealed and will raise a number of issues on appeal that he contends are likely to result in the reversal of his conviction, or a new trial. " 

The appeal comes after the United States Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia denied Navarro's request for release while pending an appeal the day prior. The three-judge panel ruled, "(Navarro) has not shown that his appeal presents substantial questions of law or fact likely to result in reversal, a new trial, a sentence that does not include a term of imprisonment, or a reduced sentence of imprisonment that is less than the amount of time already served plus the expected duration of the appeal process." 

Earlier this month, Navarro was ordered to report to the Bureau of Prisons, FCI Miami, on or before 2:00 PM on March 19, 2024, to serve his sentence for not complying with a subpoena issued by the January 6 House Select Committee. 

In January, the former aide was sentenced to four months in prison for not complying with the subpoena due to executive privilege. "When I received that congressional subpoena…I had an honest belief that the privilege had been invoked," he told US District Judge Amit Mehta at the time. 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information