Judge Engoron slaps Trump attorneys with gag order in alleged civil fraud case in New York

"Failure to abide by this directive shall result in serious sanctions."

Hannah Nightingale Washington DC

On Friday, the Manhattan judge overseeing the civil fraud case brought forth by New York Attorney General Letitia James against Donald Trump, Trump family members, and the Trump Organization, issued a gag order against the 2024 GOP frontrunner’s lawyers in the case.

Judge Arthur Engoron wrote in the order, "I hereby order that all counsel are prohibited from making any public statements, in or out of court, that refer to any confidential communications, in any form, between my staff and me."

"Failure to abide by this directive shall result in serious sanctions."

The order recounts that on October 3, Trump was hit with a gag order after posting an "untrue, disparaging, and personally identifying post about my Principle Law Clerk."

The initial gag order forbids "all parties from posting, emailing, or speaking publicly about any members of my staff."

The order came in response to a post to Truth Social made by Trump regarding Engoron’s clerk, with Trump being ordered to delete the post. 

Trump was fined $5,000 on October 20 after finding that the post was not removed from a campaign website, and was fined again on October 25, this time for $10,000, after he told reporters outside the court room, "this judge is a very partisan judge with a person who’s very partisan sitting alongside him, perhaps even more partisan than he is."

"I imposed the gag order only upon the parties, operating under the assumption that such a gag order would be unnecessary upon the attorneys, who are officers of the Court."

Engoron wrote that Trump attorneys Christopher Kise, Clifford Robert, and Alina Habba, "have made, on the record, inappropriate remarks about my Principle law Clerk, accusing her of bias against them and of improperly influencing the ongoing bench trial."

The judge said that the defendants are not "entitled to the confidential communications amongst me and my court staff. Nor are they entitled to continue referring my staff in the record."

"Defendants' First Amendment arguments in opposition to the imposition are wholly unpersuasive. This gag order is as narrowly tailored as possible to accomplish its purpose, which is to protect the safety of my staff and promote the orderly progression of this trial. As I have made clear, as the Judge in this case and the trier of fact, the gag order does not apply to me. However, I will not tolerate, under any circumstances, remarks about my court staff."

Gag Order Trump Lawyers by Hannah Nightingale on Scribd

Sign in to comment


Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information