"In a case of this magnitude, it is in the utmost interest of justice that the public is confident this monitor selection is done based solely on competency."
Judge Reed O'Connor of the Northern District of Texas raised concerns with the selection criteria, arguing on Thursday that the independent monitor should be appointed based on merit and not diversity, particularly when it comes to a case of this magnitude.
"The plea agreement requires the parties to consider race when hiring the independent monitor," the judge ruled. "Additionally, the plea agreement marginalized the Court in the selection and monitoring of the independent monitor. These provisions are inappropriate and against the public interest." He later added, "In a case of this magnitude, it is in the utmost interest of justice that the public is confident this monitor selection is done based solely on competency."
The legal battle commenced in the aftermath of two 737 MAX crashes, which resulted in the loss of 346 lives. The lawsuit was reignited earlier this year after a fuselage panel failed on the same type of aircraft in January. In May, the aerospace company was accused by the Department of Justice of violating its corporate probate pursuant to fraud conspiracy charges that were associated with the 2018 and 2019 disasters. Boeing entered a guilty plea to the charges in July at the request of prosecutors, per the Wall Street Journal.
O'Connor also expressed his dissatisfaction with the Justice Department's supervision of the probationary agreement, which was reached in the final days of the first Trump administration. Boeing acknowledged at the time that two former employees had deceived the FAA regarding a new flight-control feature on the 737 MAX that was not intended to operate in normal flight conditions. In 2021, Boeing agreed to pay a $244 million fine after reaching a settlement.
The resolution mandated that Boeing submit a report to the Justice Department regarding improvements to its compliance program. "It is fair to say the government's attempt to ensure compliance has failed," Judge O'Connor wrote, explaining that the monitor should report to the court instead of the DOJ.
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy
Comments