img

LA fires likely began as reignition of New Year's fire that LAFD ignored once it went cold: report

There had been a fire in the area 6 days earlier on New Year's Eve.

ADVERTISEMENT

There had been a fire in the area 6 days earlier on New Year's Eve.

ADVERTISEMENT
A new theory on what started the California wildfires has emerged as authorities have gathered evidence and are coming closer to seeing what started the largest of these fires. With that, the Washington Post reports that the source of the fire could have been the remnants of a fire first responders put out about a week beforehand but did not track afterward. 

According to the Washington Post, "analysis of photos, videos, satellite imagery and radio communications, as well as interviews with witnesses, offers new evidence that the Palisades Fire started in the area where firefighters had spent hours using helicopters to knock down a blaze six days earlier."

There had been a wildfire on New Year's Eve that authorities had to come and put out and officials have been speaking to residents of the area to see what sparked the Palisades fire. The outlet's analysis suggests that high winds could have reignited the embers or remnants from the older fire just days earlier.

Reignitions are commonplace in states such as California that get frequent wildfires, and officials frequently warn that areas burnt by wildfires that are seemingly extinguished can flare up even weeks afterward if fire smolders underground or inside wood. Despite that, an LA Fire Department spokesman told the outlet that it is not the department's practice to maintain patrols on recently extinguished fires. 

Residents of the area said that the response to the Palisades fire was much slower than the previous one on New Year's Eve.

“We know that fires rekindle and transition from smoldering to flaming," professor of mechanical engineering and fire scientist Michael Gollner told reporters. “It’s certainly possible that something from that previous fire, within a week, had rekindled and caused the ignition."

The Post analyzed the burn scar from the New Year's Eve fire and compared the satellite imagery to the Palisades fire to come to its theory. However, it is not conclusive.

“The evidence you have here indicates that it is at least conceivable that remnants from the earlier Lachman Fire gave rise to the Palisades Fire,” former Syracuse Professor Jacob Bendix of geography and the environment said. “While the passage of time reduces the probability of restarting, the elapsed time does not make it unrealistic, especially in the absence of intervening precipitation.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Dean

'...an LA Fire Department spokesman told the outlet that it is not the department's practice to maintain patrols on recently extinguished fires. ' The have a 'spokesman' and not a 'spokesperson'? Oh my. And checking on the status of a fire that was 'put out' would be prudent, practicle but not DEI.

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2025 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information