Merrick Garland claims House used 'congressional authority' as 'a partisan weapon' by holding him in contempt

"It is deeply disappointing that this House of Representatives has turned a serious congressional authority into a partisan weapon," Garland wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

"It is deeply disappointing that this House of Representatives has turned a serious congressional authority into a partisan weapon," Garland wrote.

Image
Jarryd Jaeger Vancouver, BC
ADVERTISEMENT

On Wednesday, Attorney General Merrick Garland repsonded to the House of Representatives vote to hold him in contempt of Congress for refusing to hand over audio of Joe Biden's interviews with special counsel Robert Hur during his investigation into the president's handling of classified documents.  

Garland called House Resolution 1292 "deeply disappointing," suggesting that the 216-207 vote in favor of the resolution to hold him in contempt presented a number of issues regarding the separation of powers, among other things. He has repeatedly stated that complying with the subpoena was not possible as Biden had asserted executive privilege and would have compromised future investigations. 

"It is deeply disappointing that this House of Representatives has turned a serious congressional authority into a partisan weapon," Garland wrote in a statement released by the Department of Justice. "Today's vote disregards the constitutional separation of powers, the Justice Department's need to protect its investigations, and the substantial amount of information we have provided to the Committees." 

He went on to state that he "will always stand up for this Department, its employees, and its vital mission to defend our democracy." 
 
Earlier this month, Garland appeared before Congress to explain why he continued to withhold the audio of the interview, pointing out that his office went to "extraordinary lengths to ensure that the committee gets responses to its legitimate requests for information." In addition to Hur's five-hour testimony, the DOJ provided Hur's report, as well as transcripts of the interview. 

"We have made clear that we will not provide audio recordings from which the transcripts that you already have were created," Garland said. "Releasing the audio would chill cooperation with the department in future investigations and it could influence witnesses’ answers if they thought the audio of their law enforcement interviews would be broadcast to Congress and the public."   

The audio would potentially give more insight into the mental abilities of the president, given that the transcript was reportedly edited to clear out filler words. Hur found through the interviews that Biden should not be prosecuted over the classified documents case in part would because he would be found to be an “well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory” by a jury.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information