Manoj Govindbalunikam's defense attorney argued that a longer sentence would trigger Govindbalunikam’s automatic deportation.
Manoj Govindbalunikam, who has had permanent residency in Canada since 2013 appeared in a Sault Ste. Marie courtroom this week for his sentencing hearing after pleading guilty in May to one count of abducting a person under the age of 14. The charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
During the hearing, defense attorney Jessica Belisle and assistant Crown attorney Adrianna Mucciarelli made submissions before Ontario Court Justice Michael Varpio. The hearing included two written victim impact statements, one from the victim’s mother and another from the child, prepared with help from his aunt.
Tensions rose when Judge Varpio called for a recess to review the statements privately, prompting an objection from the boy’s mother, who insisted the statements should be read aloud first.
"It should be read in court, not him reading it before. I'm sorry, I don't approve of that," the mother said, according to Orillia Matters.
"I understand this is a very emotionally charged environment, but justice will be done in as calm and dispassionate fashion as possible," the judge replied.
Following the recess, Mucciarelli made submissions supporting the Crown’s recommendation for a two-year jail term with 18 months of probation. Belisle, meanwhile, requested a conditional discharge with three years of probation. She alternatively suggested that if her client receives jail time that he is sentenced to no more than six months minus one day. She argued that a longer sentence would trigger Govindbalunikam’s automatic deportation, as he is a permanent resident who has lived in Canada since 2013.
“I suggest we should take that into consideration,” argued Belisle.
Belisle also emphasized that while the abduction was a serious crime, the child was not physically harmed. She said her client has already spent two days in custody and has complied with 805 days of bail conditions.
Judge Varpio is set to deliver his decision on November 19, when he will also hear additional submissions from counsel. Following the hearing, the parents expressed frustration, with the father yelling “You’re a piece of sh*t” in the hallway.
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

Comments
2025-11-12T18:52-0500 | Comment by: Steve
All of the above is unfortunately not surprising, as Canada and the U.K. are more concerned with the welfare of "immigrants" than the people who actually made those countries (once) great places. One of my biggest takeaways is the incredibly short maximum sentence for kidnapping a child under 14: 10 years?! "Well, the child wasn't harmed," says the perps lawyers. Yeah. I'm sure being held against his will was a just a quick vacation for the lad. Mom and Dad probably "Netflixed-and-Chilled" since they got some time off from taking care of the tyke. Nothing to see here...