"Adolescents assigned female at birth initiate transgender care 2.5 to 7.1 times more frequently than those assigned male at birth, according to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH)," the report, written by Michelle Conlin, Robin Respaut, and Chad Tehrune reads.
It is true that girls are undergoing gender-transition procedures at alarmingly higher rates than boys, though it's important to note that WPATH is an organization that promotes the medicalization of children with gender identity issues, and recently recommended removing age barriers for doing so.
https://rumble.com/embed/v1j5puw/?pub=2n05b
As the fight against the medicalization of children in the name of "gender-affirming care" intensifies, Reuters published a "special report" on the growing disproportionate popularity of transgenderism in young girls that had several glaring biases.
Throughout the report, titled "A gender imbalance emerges among trans teens seeking treatment," Reuters attempted to posture as non-partisan, but ended up using left-wing ideological terms like "assigned female at birth" to refer to girls and contradicting itself multiple times about why transitioning is becoming popular among adolescent females.
Medicalized gender transition procedures include the blocking of puberty, taking cross-sex hormones, and surgical procedures like mastectomies, vagioplasties, phalloplasties, facial reconstruction surgeries, and more.
"Several clinics in the United States told Reuters that among their patients, the ratio was nearly 2-to-1, and similar phenomena have been documented in Europe, Canada and Australia," the piece added, accurately highlighting the discrepancy.
However, the writers began to show even more bias by assuming every "gender-care specialist" is acting in good faith by altering and/or removing the healthy functional body parts of teens.
According to the "Reuters Special Report," the dramatic increase in youths seeking out transgender procedures has "led to a split among gender-care specialists: those who urge caution to ensure that only adolescents deemed well-suited to treatment after thorough evaluation receive it, and those who believe that delays in treatment unnecessarily prolong a child’s distress and put them at risk of self-harm."
There was no mention made of a third group of medical practitioners – those in it for the money.
Back in September, Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, came under fire after revelations that the hospital has been performing medicalized gender transitions on minors and reveling in how much money they were bringing in because of it.
In a video released on September 20 by Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire, a woman identified as Dr. Shayne Taylor boasted that transgender surgeries are a "big moneymaker," further explaining that the patients require many follow-ups.
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1572313523232931840
"Some of our VUMC financial folks in October of 2016 put down some costs of how much money we think each patient would bring in. And this is only including top surgery — this isn't including any bottom surgery — and it's a lot of money," Taylor said, referring to surgeries to remove female patients' breasts (top) and those to alter genitalia (bottom).
"Within the gender-care community, top surgery is considered a safe and effective way to alleviate a major source of anguish in transgender boys."
Throughout the piece, Reuters highlighted one of the top transgender cosmetic surgeons in the country, Sidhbh Gallagher, who has amassed a huge TikTok following for posting musical videos about performing double mastectomies on teenage girls.
This very same doctor has recently gone viral for performing a faulty mastectomy on a trans-identifying female, who made a Twitter thread about nearly dying from blood loss as a result of a botched surgery while Dr. Gallagher dismissed their concerns.
https://twitter.com/heterodorx/status/1593617861385326592
In a statement that essentially regurgitated the mainstream talking points surrounding the matter, the authors made the claim that "professionals in the gender-care community agree that treatment of all transgender children should be supportive and affirming."
This was proven to be incorrect later in the piece when they cited an ex-WPATH board member and transgender psychologist who treats gender-questioning youth.
"Girls have a harder time with the physical and emotional changes that come with the onset of puberty," said Dr. Erica Anderson to Reuters on the increase of young girls identifying as transgender. "And I think there is an element of truth that males have it better in many quarters of society than females."
"Kids do try things on and not everything sticks. They experiment," Anderson continued, before dropping the bombshell.
"I do not believe that we have an obligation to accept at face value everything a young person says to us," the former WPATH member said, blowing the theory that the only treatment for children who think they're trans should be "affirming" out of the water.
Reuters then cited a Finnish doctor who acknowledges that social contagion is at least partially responsible for children, especially girls, identifying as trans, but still thinks this is fine.
"In Finland, which was early to embrace gender care for minors, Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, chief psychiatrist at the Tampere University Hospital Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, noticed a few years ago that the profile of patients seeking to medically transition was shifting," the authors wrote.
"Many showed no signs of gender dysphoria until puberty, were mostly assigned female at birth – reaching 90 percent of patients by 2017 – and often belonged to similar social circles in school and online. In some cases, she said, patients described personal experiences with exactly the same details."
"That these teens were possibly emulating each other didn't bother Kaltiala," the report continued.
"That is perfectly normal," the doctor told the publication.