Canadian News

StopSOP lawyers risked their careers for the sake of sanity and a silent majority supported them

Ontario’s Law Society just had its elections, in which lawyers across the province elect their representatives for the monthly board meetings. The Law Societies are the regulatory bodies in each province for the legal profession.

Mika Ryu Montreal, QC
Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Support The Post Millennial

This article was published more than 1 year ago, information might not be accurate.

As the big tech tyrants tighten their grip, join us for more free speech at Parler—the anti-censorship social media platform.

Ontario’s Law Society just had its elections, in which lawyers across the province elect their representatives for the monthly board meetings. The Law Societies are the regulatory bodies in each province for the legal profession.

Out of 40 available positions, 22 of the election winners were those who ran against the Law Society’s new “statement of principles,” which would have forced all lawyers to write and follow a statement talking about “equality, diversity and inclusion.” The group became known as “StopSOP”, which directly referred to the statement of principles.

The seats are divided into 20 for Toronto lawyers and 20 for Ontario lawyers outside of Toronto. In the former category, Murray Klippenstein received more votes than anyone else. He had been one of the most vocal critics of the new “statement of principles.”

He wrote this piece on Quillette speaking out against the new compelled speech. Quillette has become a platform for ideas that have come to be considered “wrongthink” in academic circles.

The big picture, if one can be drawn from these election results, is an encouraging one. Mr. Klippenstein had reportedly wound down his law firm in anticipation of heavy professional consequences for what he was trying to do. What he might not have predicted is the level of support he would receive from a vast silent majority of reasonable lawyers.

The message is a dark cloud with a silver lining. On the one hand, the potential for consequences were huge. Those who opposed having to extol diversity for diversity’s own sake were effectively at risk of losing their professional license. On the other hand, the silent majority spoke up, and this time, it is not a silent majority that can be dismissed as a bunch of uneducated racists.

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial