"In the meantime, California has agreed to put the law on hold and not enforce its unconstitutional mask ban."
Wiener said, "It’s now illegal for ICE and other law enforcement to cover their faces in the state of California. Starting today, my new anti-masking law goes into effect. I introduced and passed this law to stop ICE and any other law enforcement from covering their faces and effectively operating as secret police."
He continued, "It is horrifying what federal agents are doing, tearing families apart, operating in the shadows, not identifying themselves, covering their faces so you don’t even know who you’re dealing with." He said this was "absolutely unacceptable, and it’s not how law enforcement should ever be operating." He said wearing masks destroys "community trust and it makes us all less safe."
First Assistant US Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli wrote in response to Wiener, "This isn't true. California has no authority to regulate federal agents. This state law violates the federal Supremacy Clause. We have asked a federal judge to strike it down, and a hearing is scheduled for January 12. In the meantime, California has agreed to put the law on hold and not enforce its unconstitutional mask ban, which is designed to allow radical leftists to dox federal agents enforcing immigration laws."
The US District Court for the Central District of California in early December granted a joint stipulation agreement reached between the plaintiffs and defendants in the case, with the court writing that "Defendants the State of California, Governor Newsom, Attorney General Bonta agree that neither they, nor their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and other persons who are in active concert or participation with them, will enforce, or take any action to enforce the Challenged Provisions (as defined in the stipulation of the parties) of Senate Bills 627 and 805 (2025-2026 Reg. Session), against federal law enforcement agencies or officers, until such time as the Court rules on Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction."
The challenged provisions were sections 2 and 3 of Senate Bill 627, and sections 2 and 10 of Senate Bill 805. Wiener authored Senate Bill 627, which makes it a crime for law enforcement, both local and federal, to wear face coverings while on duty except in limited circumstances. Senate Bill 805 requires that law enforcement in the state that is not uniformed must visibly display identification including their agency and either a name or badge number, except in certain circumstances, like working undercover.
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

Comments