img
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

SCOTUS blocks NY from eliminating NYC's ONLY GOP congressional district

Justice Samuel Alito said the order from the New York Supreme Court "is unadorned racial discrimination."

ADVERTISEMENT

Justice Samuel Alito said the order from the New York Supreme Court "is unadorned racial discrimination."

Image
Hannah Nightingale Washington DC

The Supreme Court has paused an order from New York that would have required the state to redraw its Congressional map. The request for the review came from GOP Rep Nichole Malliotakis, who represents the District 11, the district in question, along with state officials, and potentially disenfranchised New York voters. 

In his concurring opinion, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the order from the New York Supreme Court for the New York Independent Redistricting Commission "draw a new congressional district for the express purpose of ensuring that 'minority voters' are able to elect the candidate of their choice" discriminates "on the basis of race." The district at issue is the 11th District, which covers the area of Staten Island and part of the Bay Ridge neighborhood of Brooklyn. It is the only GOP-led district in New York City.

He said the order "is unadorned racial discrimination" and an "odious" activity that violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. He wrote that the order does not meet the extraordinary circumstances laid out by the law. 

He said that the Supreme Court stepped in because "there is an unacceptably strong possibility that the applicants’ appeal in the state court system will not conclude until it is too late for us to review the ultimate decision by means of a writ of certiorari, even if it appears that the decision is based on a seriously mistaken understanding of the Constitution."

He took aim at Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent, writing that it "demands that we wait until the completion of a series of events that would likely run out the clock before we could review the order. That would provide a way of achieving what full review would not permit: the use of an unconstitutional district in the November election and the election of a Member of the House of Representatives whose entitlement to the office would be tainted. That is a prospect this Court should not countenance."

Per SCOTUSblog, the ruling has cleared the way for the state to go forward in the 2026 elections using the state’s existing congressional map. 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2026 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy