Comment Below
minute read
ADVERTISEMENT
The Associated Press has updated the guidelines in its stylebook for journalists regarding abortion, instructing writers to no longer use language that could be regarded as pro-life.
"Use the modifiers anti-abortion or abortion-rights; don’t use pro-life, pro-choice or pro-abortion unless they are in quotes or proper names. Avoid abortionist, which connotes a person who performs clandestine abortions," the stylebook now says.
The Associated Press stylebook is the most widely used guide amongst journalists on all points on the political spectrum, but it is likely that some news outlets will not be following these updated rules.
The choice of words used can certainly alter the narrative of a story, argue Virginia Allen and Mary Margaret Olohan of The Daily Signal.
A survey from June of this year revealed that around half of Americans approved with the Supreme Court's decision to overturn abortion landmark ruling Roe v. Wade.
"The Associated Press Stylebook’s decision to replace the term 'pro-life' with 'anti-abortion' is another attempt from the left to paint the pro-life community in a negative light," Allen and Olohan argue, adding that the updated language doesn't reflect the pro-life community that exists today.
"If news outlets want to represent the pro-life and pro-choice communities accurately, they will be wise to ignore these latest updates from the Associated Press Stylebook," they add.
Given the prevelence of left-wing rhetoric in the mainstream, it is likely that these guidelines will be followed by the majority of news outlets, a move that could further erode the trust that Americans have legacy media.
An Axios poll from last year concluded that trust in traditional media has declined to an all time low. This tracks with the fact that a number of mainstream media outlets have announced mass layoffs recently, including CNN and the Washington Post.
"Use the modifiers anti-abortion or abortion-rights; don’t use pro-life, pro-choice or pro-abortion unless they are in quotes or proper names. Avoid abortionist, which connotes a person who performs clandestine abortions," the stylebook now says.
The Associated Press stylebook is the most widely used guide amongst journalists on all points on the political spectrum, but it is likely that some news outlets will not be following these updated rules.
The choice of words used can certainly alter the narrative of a story, argue Virginia Allen and Mary Margaret Olohan of The Daily Signal.
A survey from June of this year revealed that around half of Americans approved with the Supreme Court's decision to overturn abortion landmark ruling Roe v. Wade.
"The Associated Press Stylebook’s decision to replace the term 'pro-life' with 'anti-abortion' is another attempt from the left to paint the pro-life community in a negative light," Allen and Olohan argue, adding that the updated language doesn't reflect the pro-life community that exists today.
"If news outlets want to represent the pro-life and pro-choice communities accurately, they will be wise to ignore these latest updates from the Associated Press Stylebook," they add.
Given the prevelence of left-wing rhetoric in the mainstream, it is likely that these guidelines will be followed by the majority of news outlets, a move that could further erode the trust that Americans have legacy media.
An Axios poll from last year concluded that trust in traditional media has declined to an all time low. This tracks with the fact that a number of mainstream media outlets have announced mass layoffs recently, including CNN and the Washington Post.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy
