Biden admin to appeal federal court ruling restricting their ability to censor free speech online

"Our view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take action or to take account of the effects of their platforms."

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Hannah Nightingale Washington DC
ADVERTISEMENT

On Wednesday, Biden’s Department of Justice filed a notice of appeal in a Louisiana federal court after a federal judge ruled on Tuesday that the administration likely violated the First Amendment with their efforts to censor and suppress Americans' free speech by colluding with social media companies.

According to Bloomberg, the Department of Justice’s filing signals the administration's intent to take the case up to the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

The department also plans to ask the court to put Judge Terry Doughty’s ruling on hold during the appeal, a person familiar with the matter told the outlet.

On Tuesday, Doughty blocked administration officials from contacting social media companies with the intention of censoring political views and other speech protected under the First Amendment.

"The evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario," wrote Judge Doughty. "During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth.’"

Doughty said the plaintiffs, Republican attorneys general from Missouri and Louisiana, "have presented substantial evidence in support of their claims that they were the victims of a far-reaching and widespread censorship campaign."

The attorneys general alleged that the Biden administration was using a "federal censorship enterprise," and pressured social media platforms to remove posts questioning Covid-19 health policies, the origin of the pandemic, questions regarding the results of the 2020 election, the Hunter Biden laptop story, among other topics.

"If the allegations made by Plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history," the injunction adds. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the Federal Government, and particularly the Defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment’s right to free speech."

Doughty also wrote that "the censorship in this case almost exclusively targeted conservative speech," but added that the issues raised in the case extend "beyond party lines."

On Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in response to the ruling, "Our view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take action or to take account of the effects of their platforms."

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by StructureCMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information