Washington state high school sports board proposes to keep men out of women’s sports, create ‘open division’ for all gender identities

One of the amendments proposed by The Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA) would create a girls’ division and an "open division." In the new division, all students could participate, regardless if their gender identity matches the sex they were born as. The other amendment proposes the creation of a boys division, girls division, and an "open division."

According to the new proposal, "The WIAA encourages participation for all students, regardless of their gender identity or expression. Further, most local, state, and federal rules and regulations require schools to provide transgender and other gender-diverse student-athletes with equal opportunities to participate in athletics. However, in order to maintain fair and equitable competition, participation in girls' sports and girls' divisions of sports is restricted to students who were assigned female at birth. The purpose of this policy is to offer clarity with respect to the participation of trans and gender-diverse student-athletes. Additionally, this policy encourages a culture in which student-athletes can compete in a safe and supportive environment, free of discrimination."

The proposal goes on to make the case that girls' sports should be restricted to students who were born female to ensure a "level playing field," but discusses the possibility of creating an appeals process as a "pathway for gender-diverse student-athletes to participate in competition best-aligned to their physiological development."

The proposal lists arguments for and against the amendment, including potential legal challenges as cons. The Kennewick, Mead, Moses Lake, and Colville school districts have already announced their support for the proposals.

In May, a trans-identified male athlete won the Washington state girls' 400-meter race by over a full second, leading the East Valley (Spokane) girls' track team to a state championship. The following month, the losing team’s track and field coach spoke out against state rules that allow biological males to compete in female-designated sports, telling the Independent Women’s Forum that his team would have won the state championship if it were not for the inclusion of one of these trans-identifying male athletes.

"We had no idea that this was coming. As a coach, I found out about it just through talking to other coaches from around the state. Then, in the [girls’] 400-meter open race, the individual from our school that qualified only found out about an hour before."

The coach added, "The male [runner] is going to be stronger and more powerful, so you use that to your advantage to get yourself around the track. As a woman, the level of strength and power is different, so you end up having to do it with more grace and finesse," noting "We’ve had many coaches, through text, emails, or just verbally, state their displeasure with the situation."

He continued, "My biggest disappointment in this situation is how our state association [the WIAA] didn’t prepare us for what was coming." In October, a trans-identified male runner, who competed as a male in the 2021 season and finished the season overall in 72nd place, led his team in the women’s division to victory in a Washington cross-country championship. The WIAA is scheduled to discuss and potentially adopt the amendments on January 27 during the organization’s virtual Winter Coalition.