Women athletes allowed to sue Connecticut over letting boys in girls' high school sports

The case had initially been dismissed by a judge in the state in 2021, with a three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit affirming the decision one year ago.

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Hannah Nightingale Washington DC
ADVERTISEMENT

The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals revived a lawsuit on Friday brought forth by four female track and field athletes against the state, challenging the rules that allow trans-identified males to compete in women’s sports.

The judges found that the female runners have standing to sue, and have described injuries that could qualify for monetary damages, according to NBC News.

The runners are also seeking to alter some athletic records, alleging that they were deprived of opportunities at the elite-level competitions because the trans-identified males were allowed to compete.

The case had initially been dismissed by a judge in the state in 2021, with a three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit affirming the decision one year ago. 

Both sides of the case called the ruling a victory, with the ACLU and ACLU Foundation of Connecticut, who are representing transgender runners Andraya Yearwood and Terry Miller, citing that the court wrote that the trans-identified runners have an "ongoing interest in litigating against any alteration of their public athletic records."

Roger Brooks, a lawyer for Alliance Defending Freedom, who is representing the four female runners, said the decision was a victory "not only for the women who have been deprived of medals, potential scholarships, and other athletic opportunities, but for all female athletes across the country."

The lawsuit was brought forth in 2020 on behalf of runners Selina Soule, Chelsea Mitchell, Alanna Smith, and Ashley Nicoletti over a Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference policy that allows biological males to compete on women’s teams.

Three of the 15 judges who heard arguments in the case earlier this year dissented to the ruling fully on Friday, with an additional five judges dissenting to portions of the majority ruling.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information