
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision."
In a statement Monday, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts stated that impeachment "is not an appropriate response" to disagreeing with a judicial decision, coming after President Donald Trump called for the impeachment of the Obama-appointed judge who ordered for planes full of gang members being deported to El Salvador be stopped over the weekend.
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose," Roberts said in a rare statement, per NBC News.
Trump wrote on Tuesday morning, "This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President - He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING!"
"I WON FOR MANY REASONS, IN AN OVERWHELMING MANDATE, BUT FIGHTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MAY HAVE BEEN THE NUMBER ONE REASON FOR THIS HISTORIC VICTORY. I’m just doing what the VOTERS wanted me to do. This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!! WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!" Trump added.
On Saturday, Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which was quickly challenged in court. Judge James Boasberg issued an order Saturday evening temporarily halting use of the act, the timing of which has come under questioning after planes with gang members departed from the US to El Salvador. The Trump administration has said that it complied with the written order from Boasberg, which was issued after the planes were in the air.
On Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters when pressed on the issue, "All of the planes that were subject to the written order—the judge's written order—took off before the order was entered in the courtroom on Saturday, and the administration will, of course, be happily answering all of those questions that the judge poses in court later today."
In the hearing, lawyers representing the Trump administration argued that the administration "complied with the [written] order," and argued that it took precedence over the oral order given by Boasberg at 6:45 pm on Saturday.
Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments
Join and support independent free thinkers!
We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.
Remind me next month
To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy
Comments