img

House GOP slams Biden's DHS for pushing big tech companies to suppress Americans' free speech during 2020 election

The letter noted that CIS's after-action report claimed, "61 percent of cases it 'reported' up the chain to social media companies were taken down or labeled as misinformation." 

ADVERTISEMENT

The letter noted that CIS's after-action report claimed, "61 percent of cases it 'reported' up the chain to social media companies were taken down or labeled as misinformation." 

ADVERTISEMENT

In a letter to the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) director Marci Andino House on Wednesday, Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Mark Green, R-TN, and Dan Bishop, R-NC, claimed that the agency coordinated with Non-governmental organizations (NGO) and social media companies and "potentially suppressed American's speech." 

The letter obtained by the Daily Mail alleged, "During the 2020 election, the Center for Internet Security (CIS) created a 'misinformation reporting system' that 'allowed election officials to report a case of election infrastructure misinformation to a single source..." which was then reported to social media companies to take down or label as "misinformation." 

"CIS would receive a 'misinformation report' from election officials or the Election Integrity Project (EIP) and CIS would forward reports to CISA's Countering Foreign Interference Task Force, which would forward those reports to social media companies," the letter said. 

The letter noted that CIS's after-action report claimed, "61 percent of cases it 'reported' up the chain to social media companies were taken down or labeled as misinformation." 

"The CIS after-action report makes clear the CISA directly engaged with social media companies to suppress Americans' social media content," the letter claimed. "Alarmingly, CIS notes that for future projects when social media companies are reluctant to participate in the suppression scheme, 'it will be critical to define the role of all involved parties and for those entities, especially the social media platforms to accept their role.'"

"If there was no legal leverage to compel social media cooperation during the 2020 election, was the federal government, through CISA, used as a strong arm?" the letter questions.  

The director of CISA, Jen Easterly, claimed in testimony to Congress in March, "We don't flag anything to social media organizations at all."

The scheme was reported in the release of the Twitter files in March by Journalist Matt Taibbi. The report claimed that "Twitter was more like a partner to the government. wit other tech firms, it held a regular 'industry meeting' with FBI and DHS, and developed a formal system for receiving thousands of content reports from every corner of government."  

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information