img

PA Supreme Court rules AG must review cases Philly's Soros DA wants to overturn — cites misrepresentations of fact, unreliability

The court's opinion sharply criticized the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office's handling of conviction-review cases.

The court's opinion sharply criticized the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office's handling of conviction-review cases.

Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court has ruled that if the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office wants to overturn a conviction in state court, the state's Attorney General's Office must be given the opportunity to review the case and ensure an appropriate investigation was conducted.

The ruling came from the High Court through a King's Bench petition. The case that prompted the ruling involved Lavar Brown, who was convicted in Philadelphia for murders tied to robberies and shootings in 2003 and 2005, per KWY News. He received a life sentence in the 2003 case, and had sent to death row for the 2005 case. Under DA Larry Krasner’s office, the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office reviewed the case via post-conviction proceedings and conceded error.

The court's opinion sharply criticized the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office's handling of conviction-review cases. In the ruling, the justices wrote that Brown's case revealed a pattern of problems, alleging the office had "conceded relief although none was warranted," violated its duty of candor, withheld material evidence, misstated facts, failed to conduct a reasonable investigation, and opposed a required evidentiary hearing. The court further noted that since 2018, the office had conceded relief in more than 100 cases and cited "numerous instances of untrustworthy concessions, lack of candor, misrepresentations of fact, lack of adequate investigation, and avoidance of hearings." The ruling claimed his office is “unreliable.”

District Attorney Larry Krasner blasted the five Democratic and two Republican justices for their decision. Krasner decried the decision, saying, “Does that help democracy? No. It actually undermines the value of a vote in Philadelphia as compared to every other county.”

He continued, “Does it help with safety? We've already seen that there being integrity in the system and correcting the mistakes of the past builds trust, makes people more willing to go to court, to testify, and to contact the police.”

Sign in to comment

Comments

Justine

"Unreliable??" A better description would be extreme malfeasance a more appropriate view of krasner's policy would be willful criminal negligence wrt further crimes committed by the criminals his office has freed and thereby allowed to reoffend.

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2026 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy