img

Texas can stop giving in-state college tuition to illegal aliens: Appeals Court

The Texas Dream Act allowed certain illegal immigrant students to pay resident tuition rates at public colleges and universities.

The Texas Dream Act allowed certain illegal immigrant students to pay resident tuition rates at public colleges and universities.

Image
Roberto Wakerell-Cruz Montreal QC
A federal appeals court has upheld Texas' ban on in-state tuition benefits for illegal immigrants, keeping a decision in place that stopped the state’s Dream Act from being enforced.

The 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected an attempt by students, immigration advocacy groups, and Austin Community College to intervene in the case and defend the 2001 law. The court ruled Thursday that their effort could not succeed because federal law prevents Texas from offering the benefit.

The Texas Dream Act allowed certain illegal immigrant students to pay resident tuition rates at public colleges and universities. To qualify, students had to live in Texas for at least three years, graduate from a Texas high school, and sign an affidavit stating they planned to seek lawful permanent residency as soon as possible.



The case began after the US Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the law in June 2025, arguing it conflicted with federal immigration rules. Texas officials agreed with the challenge, and a federal judge later issued a permanent order blocking enforcement of the statute.

After the state declined to defend the law, Students for Affordable Tuition, La Union del Pueblo Entero (LUPE), Austin Community College, and University of North Texas student Oscar Silva sought to join the lawsuit. They argued they should be allowed to defend the program themselves.

In a 2-1 ruling, the appeals court disagreed. Judge Jerry E. Smith, writing for the majority, said federal law bars states from providing in-state tuition to illegal immigrants based on residency unless the same tuition benefit is available to all US citizens regardless of their state of residence.

The judges also ruled the groups could not appeal the previous consent judgment because they were never admitted as parties in the original case.

Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez issued a dissent, arguing the lower court should have first examined whether there was a valid legal dispute because Texas and the federal government had already agreed on the outcome before the lawsuit was filed.

The ruling means students who previously received lower resident tuition rates under the Texas Dream Act will remain unable to access those benefits at public universities across the state.

Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2026 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy